Over 30 years of anarchist writing from Ireland listed under hundreds of topics
The Programme for National Recovery, launched in October 1987, was the culmination of almost a year of talks between the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and the then Fianna Fail government led by Charlie Haughey.What is the
Programme for National Recovery?
The Programme for National Recovery, launched in October 1987, was
the culmination of almost a year of talks between the Irish Congress
of Trade Unions and the then Fianna Fail government led by Charlie
Haughey. It was a three-year deal which committed the trade union
movement to industrial peace in return for 'moderate' pay increases
(i.e less than inflation), tax reform, and government action on
unemployment. Pointing to the situation in Britain where Thatcher had
decimated trade union organisation, ICTU leaders claimed that the
deal would protect the movement here from similar attacks from the
right.
It was sold to workers on the basis that by accepting pay
increases which were lower than inflation, this would help the
government to get the public finances under control and that as a
result of this jobs would be created. Despite the fact that within
days of the Programme's launch (at a Press reception attended by the
entire Fianna Fail cabinet and the leadership of ICTU) the government
announced a massive round of public service cuts, and despite the
fact that the Programme itself specifically endorsed job losses in
the public sector, ICTU leaders heralded the PNR as a victory for the
trade union movement.
What ICTU failed to point out was that the only side which had
given specific commitments in the deal was the trade unions. While
pay increases were specifically pegged at rates which were well below
expected inflation - with no review for at least two years -
commitments by government and employers were couched in vague and
generalised terms. Indeed, it would be more correct to describe them
as aspirations rather than commitments. The deal was opposed by some
on the grounds that it was a poor deal, that more could have been
achieved with stronger negotiators. Others - including the WSM -
opposed the very notion of the trade union leadership doing
centralised deals with government and employers over the heads of the
members.
So began what was to become known as "social partnership", leading
to The Programme for Economic and Social Progress (1991 - 1993) and
the current deal the Programme for Competitiveness and Work (due to
run until the end of 1996). Each succesive deal has brought ICTU
closer and closer to the government - to the extent that it is no
exaggeration to describe them as being the third arm of the current
Fianna Fail/Labour coalition government. All of the consequences
pointed out by the deals' opponents back in 1987 have come to
fruition.
This article first appeared in Red & Black Revolution No 1. 1994